On preferring
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract In this paper, I draw attention to comparative preference claims, i.e. sentences of the form $$\ulcorner $$ ⌜ S prefers p q $$\urcorner ⌝ . show that claims exhibit interesting patterns, and try develop a semantics captures them. Then use my account provide an analysis desire. The resulting entry for desire ascriptions is independently motivated, finds support from wide range phenomena.
منابع مشابه
On Preferring and Inspecting Abductive Models
This work proposes the application of preferences over abductive logic programs as an appealing declarative formalism to model choice situations. In particular, both a priori and a posteriori handling of preferences between abductive extensions of a theory are addressed as complementary and essential mechanisms in a broader framework for abductive reasoning. Furthermore, both of these choice me...
متن کاملFat-preferring rats consume more alcohol than carbohydrate-preferring rats.
Rats with a genetic preference for alcohol (ETOH) have been found to consume more dietary fat then ETOH nonpreferring rats. We therefore hypothesized that rats selected on the basis of fat and carbohydrate (CHO) preferences would differ in ETOH intake. Patterns of macronutrient self-selection were determined by allowing rats to select diets from separate sources of CHO, fat and protein. Subsequ...
متن کاملExplaining Preferences, Preferring Explanations?
In this paper we study the possibility of providing causal explanations for preferred answer sets, as those obtained from logic programs with ordered disjunction (LPODs). We use a recently defined multi-valued semantics for answer sets based on a causal algebra and consider its direct application to LOPDs by several illustrating examples. We also explain the limitations of this simple approach ...
متن کاملPreferring maximum confirmation diagnoses
Models used for Model-Based Diagnosis usually assume that the inaccuracy of data is smaller than the precision with which the data is described. In some domains, however, this assumption is invalid. Observations may not be accurate or the behavior model of the system does not allow for accurate predictions. Therefore, the accuracy of predictions, which is a function of the accuracy of the obser...
متن کاملOn the Comparison of Theories: Preferring the Most Specific Explanation
Default reasoning is reasoning with generalised knowledge which we want to use if there is no more specific knowledge also applicable. This paper presents a formal, model-theoretic characterisation of default reasoning. Defaults are treated as possible hypotheses in a "scientific" theory to explain the results. One of the problems with systems that reason with defaults occurs when two answers c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistics and Philosophy
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0165-0157', '1573-0549']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09351-4